Art Still Life Essay Sample free essay sample

Still life is a type of painting. It’s a image of objects that don’t move. The creative person looks at objects. like vases. fruit. bottle’s flower’s and surveies the manner the light hits the objects. the shadow’s and the form. Archie Forrest is a Scots creative person. who was born in 1950. Archie attended the Glasgow school of art in 1969 and left in 1973. He so spent 7 old ages learning pupils as an art coach. In 1985 he stopped learning and wholly devoted him clip. to doing art. Forrest’s work is really popular and has appeared in many different galleries throughout Scotland. He is now aged 62 and still continues to lend his work. ‘Wee group’ is an illustration of Archie’s work. The pulling consists of many random objects on an old wooden tabular array. The spectator chiefly focuses on the tabular array. as all the objects are found on it. We will write a custom essay sample on Art: Still Life Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The object used are. assorted fruits scattered about. a vase with many different colored flowers. a unambiguously patterned jug and an old clothe hanging off the border of the tabular array. This is an interesting combination. as these objects would non usually be found together. The drawing is split up into three subdivisions. the foreground. the background. and the midground. The underneath of the tabular array is the foreground. the objects on the tabular array are the midground. and the background is a field and tiring wall. It’s besides sectioned utilizing horizontal and perpendicular lines. The manner the fruit is placed makes a horizontal line. the tabular array. fabric. jug and vase are all perpendicular lines. The objects that make up the drawing are all in really similar colorss. like warm picket pinks. blues and picks. The horizontal objects are all in really different sunglassess from the perpendicular objects. the horizontal objects are bright orange. ruddy and green. The image as a whole has a warm feel to it. As the background and midground colorss are pale sunglassess. like calcium hydroxide viridity and pick. this makes the picture less intense. However even though the colorss used for the fruit are bright and bold. it still doesn’t take away from the pictures composure and relaxed subject. The objects merely contrast with the remainder of the pulling to pull attending to them. A strong black tone is used in the background and foreground of the image and each of the objects are clearly defined with a black lineation. doing them seem 3D. The darkened background brings in the foreground and makes it hold depth. The fruit is overlapping the jug. conveying the fruit forward and the jug backwards into the background. A batch of the fruit is besides overlapping. giving all the objects distance across the tabular array. The texture of the picture seems smooth as he uses objects that would be smooth in existent life. He makes the fruit seem absolutely round and glistening. Whereas the tabular array looks ragged and unsmooth. every bit good as the wall in the background. There’s an obvious alone form on the jug. repeated curves and lines are used to give the fruit and vase form. It looks like he’s been controlled and relaxed when pulling this. The picture to me seems really relaxed and unagitated. due to the colors Archie used. The objects on the tabular array. although they are placed indiscriminately in no peculiar order. still look tidily arranged so the picture seems orderly non mussy and loud. I don’t believe Archie Forrest has made a immense part to his motion as he is s till populating. The 2nd image I choose to analyze is. ‘still life with Earthenware and bottles’ by Van Gogh. Van Gogh is a really well-known creative person who was born in 1883. he grew up in Holland. His household were really spiritual as his male parent was a curate. When Vincent left school. he decided to follow his uncle’s calling as an art trader. Although he was happy with his work. he grew tired of the art trade. It wasn’t until 1880. aged 27. that he genuinely started to go an creative person. He attended the ‘academe Royale des Beaux arts’ in Brussels. Belgium. He immediately fell in love with art. Although he would travel on to pull more than 900 pictures in the following 10 old ages. he was neer to the full appreciated in his life-time. It was merely after he took his life in 1890 that his work was discovered and went on to act upon many creative persons to come. In this image there are two bowls. a vase. a pigment coppice. 3 bottles and an eatherw ane pot. The two smaller pots are positioned at either terminals of the tabular array. The largest pot is in the centre of the image and inside it there is the pigment coppice. They are all sat on an old looking brown tabular array. Because the bottles in this picture appear far off. we would state at that place in the background. the two bowls at either side of the picture expression closest to us. so they are in the foreground. The midground subdivision is the tabular array as it appears deeper than the foreground but non every bit deep as the background. The image itself is rather dark. Except the blue and white bowl. this stands out against everything. The image is built up of chiefly brown tones. He juxtaposed the green coloring material of the bottles in the background with the dark ruddy coloring material of the bowl in the Centre. This image is broken down into many simple soft forms they all round off at some point. The forms are average sized. except the little bowls at the side of the image and the bowl which is rather big and in the Centre of the picture to pull attending to it. The texture of the picture seems smooth and elaborate. like he’s concentrated on it a batch. He’s drawn these objects in round gestures to give them form. It looks like how it would experience in existent life. Color in this image. seems to melt from the underside of the picture to the top. making this gives the picture distance and makes it look far off. The largest form convergence with the two objects on the sides giving it depth. This image makes me experience baffled as he uses dark tones and colorss. but he besides uses a bright blue for the bowl. So I don’t know whether to experience happy or sad. I think van Gogh felt this manner to. I besides think he felt relaxed as his brushstrokes seem orderly smooth like he’s concentrated on it. Since Van Gogh’s decease he has made a immense part to art. he has influenced many creative persons and the manner art he has changed the manner art is done today. Archie and Van Gogh are two really different creative persons. Looking at Van Goghs work he was celebrated for his bold. dramatic brushstrokes that convayed his feelings. demoing he went through alot of emphasis. However archie pictures seem much more concentrated. he seems like a laid back. relaxed type individual. Very unlike Van Gogh who lived an dying and brainsick life. Van Gogh besides tended to utilize really dark sunglassess. he really seldom used bright colorss. but archie uses all different types of colors. both really bright and really dark. Although archie is in his early 60’s and still produces new art work. he has non yet made a immense part to his clip but Van Gogh. although dead. still continues to this twenty-four hours to act upon immature creative persons.